Urban planning for a climate-neutral future

Carbon-Neutral Futures Explorer

An AI-supported urban decision platform for exploring pathways to carbon neutrality.

Cities need to make connected choices about growth, mobility, buildings, land, nature and human behaviour. The Explorer brings these choices into a shared planning pathway, helping decision-makers examine how alternative urban futures could affect emissions, carbon sequestration and wider planning outcomes.

From shared priorities to spatial scenarios and measurable outcomes

Illustrative future-city visual: project team

The planning challenge

Carbon neutrality is a spatial planning challenge

Urban climate actions interact. New development changes travel demand. Transport investment influences where people and businesses locate. Zoning affects growth patterns. Green infrastructure stores carbon, manages water and changes access to nature.

Policies and behavioural responses shape whether interventions achieve their intended effects. Decisions made separately can miss these connections. A shared planning environment allows cities to examine them together.

Aerial urban image with restrained overlays identifying buildings, streets, vehicles and tree canopyBuildingsStreetsVehiclesTree canopy
Urban features can be translated into structured spatial information.Source: KTH WaterCentre. Image enhanced for presentation.

A shared evidence base

What the Explorer brings together

01

Stakeholder knowledge

Capture planning priorities, local knowledge, concerns and alternative visions from policymakers, practitioners and communities.

02

Open spatial data

Use available land, infrastructure, environmental and socioeconomic data to establish the planning context across different cities.

03

Urban futures simulation

Explore where future development, conservation and restoration could occur under different planning assumptions.

04

Connected assessments

Examine implications across buildings, transportation, green infrastructure, zoning and policy, and behavioural responses.

05

Decision-ready evidence

Compare spatial patterns, carbon outcomes and planning trade-offs in a form that supports discussion and revision.

Three mapped residential mobility patterns with movement trajectories for different income groups
Source: LEAM Team

Social and spatial context

Land cover tells only part of the story

Residential mobility patterns reveal how urban change affects different groups. Bringing this evidence into the same planning conversation helps make distributional effects visible.

The purpose is to make alternative futures visible, comparable and open to discussion.

Planning pathway

From a planning question to a revised urban pathway

The Explorer organizes planning as an iterative process. Planners and stakeholders define the problem, translate priorities into assumptions, simulate change, assemble interventions, compare outcomes and revise the pathway.

  1. 01Define

    Frame the planning question

    Clarify the target year, geographic scope, climate objective and decisions under consideration. Bring planners, policymakers and other stakeholders into a shared problem frame.

    What needs to change, where, by when—and for whom?
  2. 02Envision

    Describe the future to explore

    Turn stakeholder visions and policy language into explicit scenario assumptions. AI can help organize qualitative input and connect planning narratives with spatial parameters.

    Stakeholder priority → scenario assumption
  3. 03Simulate

    Explore urban and landscape change

    Combine existing conditions, development demand, accessibility, planning restrictions, historic land cover and stakeholder-defined assumptions.

    Reference landscape → possible patterns of change
  4. 04Intervene

    Assemble coordinated measures

    Explore measures across connected systems, from compact development and building renewal to transport, nature-based solutions, spatial policy and behaviour.

    Illustrative functionality
  5. 05Compare

    Examine outcomes and trade-offs

    Compare alternative futures using a consistent set of spatial, carbon, accessibility and planning indicators.

    One evidence structure across every scenario
  6. 06Revise

    Improve the pathway through discussion

    Review results with stakeholders, identify trade-offs, adjust assumptions and test a revised combination of measures as evidence and priorities change.

    Comparison becomes the next decision

Illustrative workshop visual: project team

Concept interface

Translate priorities into scenario settings

Envision and Intervene connect policy narratives and stakeholder input with structured measures and model inputs.

Simulate

Explore urban and landscape change

Establish a reference landscape, then examine where development, conservation or restoration could occur.

Explore historic land cover ↗
Concept interface showing an estimated land-use change map and its legend
Source: KTH WaterCentre
Compare

Bring interventions into one spatial view

Compare multiple nature-based solutions without separating them from the wider urban pathway.

Concept interface comparing the spatial allocation of nature-based solutions
Source: LEAM Team

Planning is iterative: each comparison creates a clearer basis for the next decision.

Connected urban systems

One urban future, five connected systems

Carbon-neutral planning requires more than a single model or intervention. The Explorer connects several systems around a shared spatial scenario so planners can see reinforcement and trade-offs.

01 / Buildings

Where can renewal and low-carbon development contribute most?

Explore the spatial distribution of buildings, jobs and activities. Define renewal areas and compare future development forms and densities.

Concept visualisationDetailed building assessment: TBD
Concept visualisation of employment intensity in a three-dimensional urban map
A three-dimensional view of employment intensity can support spatial targeting. · Source: LEAM Team
02 / Transportation

How do urban form and mobility choices influence emissions?

Examine how development location, accessibility and last-mile choices affect transportation outcomes, including improved connections, mode shifts and compact growth.

Explore the Last-Mile tool ↗
Broader LEAM mobility example showing residential movement patterns across income groups
Broader LEAM mobility example; not a Last-Mile interface screenshot. · Source: LEAM Team
03 / Green infrastructure

Where can nature-based solutions provide combined value?

Explore green roofs, corridors, streetscape vegetation and access improvements while considering carbon, biodiversity, heat, water and access to nature together.

Open the Nature-Based Solutions Dashboard ↗
Illustrative coordinated streetscape with planting, shade, active mobility and public space
Illustrative intervention visual: project team
Interface showing the spatial allocation of multiple nature-based solutions
Illustrative allocation across Stockholm County. · Source: LEAM Team
04 / Zoning and policy

How do plans, protection and conservation shape change?

Represent spatial policies as scenario conditions. Compare simulated development with established plans and incorporate protected or conserved land into the policy baseline.

Open the conserved-land assessment ↗
Comparison of simulated urban development with regional planning priorities
Source: KTH WaterCentre and LEAM Team
Map of conserved and protected land used as a policy baseline
Source: Illinois project team
05 / Behavioural nudges

How might people and organizations respond?

Connect policy measures with uptake assumptions, translate stakeholder concerns into scenario parameters and revise expectations as evidence becomes available.

Concept interfaceBehavioural module: TBD
Illustrative stakeholder workshop focused on hands and map annotations
Stakeholder priorities can inform assumptions and intervention design. · Project team

Each module contributes evidence to the same planning pathway.

Comparing futures

Compare possible futures before choices are fixed

Scenarios help planners examine how different combinations of growth, policy and investment could shape the city. They are structured explorations informed by explicit assumptions.

Shared comparison workspaceIllustrative scenario values

Current trajectory

Development and travel patterns continue broadly along existing trends, with currently adopted measures.

Sangamon project map showing existing and projected developmentExpand map ↗
Source: LEAM Team
Spatial change
Dispersed growth
Carbon balance
Current measures
Accessibility
Uneven access
Green provision
Existing network
Planning compatibility
Adopted plans
Target-year pathway
Incremental

Compact growth

More development is directed toward existing centres, services and public-transport connections.

Detailed land-use-change result with a complete category legendExpand map ↗
Source: LEAM Team
Spatial change
Centres prioritised
Carbon balance
Lower travel demand
Accessibility
Services closer
Green provision
Targeted provision
Planning compatibility
Plan-led
Target-year pathway
Accelerated

Green-connected growth

Development is coordinated with green infrastructure, ecosystem protection, active mobility and targeted renewal.

Four-panel comparison between modelled development and the Stockholm regional planExpand map ↗
Source: KTH WaterCentre and LEAM Team
Spatial change
Connected pattern
Carbon balance
Emissions + sinks
Accessibility
Active links
Green provision
Expanded network
Planning compatibility
Priorities aligned
Target-year pathway
Coordinated

Landscape restoration

What if restoration expands?

Urban climate pathways can include ecosystem restoration alongside changes to buildings, transport and development.

Evidence across citiesOpen six-city comparison
Nature-based-solution combinations across six European cities
Examples of nature-based-solution combinations across six European cities. · Source: LEAM Team

These tools support exploratory scenario assessment. Their outputs should be considered alongside local evidence, planning processes and stakeholder knowledge.

Existing tools and resources

Explore the tools behind the planning pathway

The Explorer brings together existing applications, project examples and learning materials. Each resource opens at its source in a new tab.

Integrated urban tools

Ecosystem and carbon scenarios

Projects, methods and learning

Tree-lined urban corridor with pedestrians, cycling space and integrated greenery

Adapted with AI from an original image by StockCake; used with permission.

About the project

Research shaped around practical planning needs

The Carbon-Neutral Futures Explorer is being developed through AI-Driven Sustainable Spatial Planning: Advancing Climate-Neutral Cities through Digital Innovation (2025–2028).

The project combines research on climate action, AI-supported urban planning and nature-based solutions to support cities in developing effective climate strategies through spatial planning. It builds on the earlier AI-powered knowledge integration to Carbon-neutral Cities project and extends the decision-support approach for large, medium and small urban contexts.

The tools are being co-developed with planners and other stakeholders so that scenario assumptions, model results and visualizations respond to practical planning needs.

Read about the project at KTH ↗
Project leadKTH through WaterCentre@KTH
Principal investigatorZahra Kalantari
Project period2025–2028
FundingFormas through Smart Built Environment
ContactZahra Kalantari

Professor, KTH Royal Institute of Technology · Project Principal Investigator

Project consortium

Research and planning partners

Led by KTH Royal Institute of Technology through WaterCentre@KTH, with research and planning partners across the consortium.

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
WaterCentre@KTH
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Region Stockholm
Trelleborg Municipality
Funded byFormasthroughSmart Built Environment